FW: Transport Binding Reviews

[Copied to xmlp-comments for the record]

-----Original Message-----
From: Eamon O'Tuathail [mailto:eamon.otuathail@clipcode.com]
Sent: 22 May 2002 10:11
To: 'Williams, Stuart'
Subject: RE: Transport Binding Reviews


Stuart,

Looking through my old emails, I came across this one from you, hidden
among lots of others. Sorry, I did not spot it when it arrived, or
respond until now. 

>> The substance of this discussion made it into the December WD [5] will
>> remain in subsequent revisions [6].

>> The WG agreed at its most recent telcon to revise the request/response
>> mep to allow a temporal overlap between a response message and its 
>> corresponding request. The proposal that was agreed on is made in [7]
>> (and referenced materials). It will be incorporated into the next
>> published spec. WD.

Both of these look fine. 

Thanks,

Eamon

P.S. I got the Robin Milner books you recommended to me a while back -
they are very interesting. 

===================

Sent: 02 May 2002 15:33
To: 'Eamon O'Tuathail'
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org; 'xmlp-comments@w3.org'
Subject: Re: Transport Binding Reviews

Eamon,

In December you responded [1] to David Fallside's request [2] for
feedback
on the transport binding framework that was being incorporated into
Working
Drafts that were published in December [3,4].

As we work towards our next Working Draft I have been asked to let you
know
how the WG has respond to your comments. It would be helpful if you
could
let us know whether we have adequately addressed you comments by 10th
May
2002 and if not what further action you would like the WG to take.

Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 05:16:35 UTC