- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 10:45:51 +0000
- To: "Wiechers, Volker" <volker.wiechers@sap.com>
- CC: "'xmlp-comments@w3.org'" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Thanks, this closure is acceptable. Marc. Wiechers, Volker wrote: > Hi all and Marc, > > during the 25th-26th February face to face meeting, the XML Protocol WG has > decided > to close issue 179 [1] following the proposed text in message [2] with the > exception that > "MUST support" was changed to "MUST enable". > > The new wording for Part 1, section 5.3 will be: > > "A binding specification MUST enable one or more Message Exchange > Patterns. A binding specification MAY state that it supports additional > features, in which case the binding specification MUST provide for > maintaining > state, performing processing, and transmitting information in a manner > consistent with the specification for those features." > > The discussion about issue 179 can be found in [3]. > > In short, the old wording seems to force each binding to > support One-Way-MEP, while the new doesn't. > > Regards, > > Volker Wiechers, SAP > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x179 > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/0194.html > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/thread.html#187 > -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 05:45:54 UTC