xmlp-comments@w3.org from March 2002 by date

Sunday, 31 March 2002

• Maintaining status-quo on question about envelope parameter on SOAP media type Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Friday, 29 March 2002

• Re: Updated example (was Re: RDF response on XMLP Issue #29) David Fallside

Thursday, 28 March 2002

• Re: SOAP Primer Review David Fallside
• Re: typo, please forward David Fallside

Wednesday, 27 March 2002

• Issue 110 resolution David Fallside
• Re: Issue 189: closed Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue Gudge General a): closed ("split part 2") Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue Gudge General a): closed ("split part 2") Paul Prescod

Monday, 25 March 2002

• RE: Issue 189: closed noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Friday, 22 March 2002

• RE: Issue #176 closed Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Issue 189: closed Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Issue 189: closed noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Issue #176 closed noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: SOAP Email Binding Meeting - Tuesday, March 26 - 8 AM PST, 11 AM EST - Con-call info Mountain, Highland M
• Issue #176 closed Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Fw: UUID message identifiers Martin Gudgin
• Re: Issue with encodingStyle Martin Gudgin
• Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types Martin Gudgin
• Issue 186 closed: Uniqueness and reference constraints on id and ref attributes Martin Gudgin
• Issue 167 closed: Support for XML Schema Types Martin Gudgin
• Issue 189: closed Jean-Jacques Moreau

Thursday, 21 March 2002

• Issue #41 closed Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Friday, 15 March 2002

• Issue Gudge General a): closed ("split part 2") Jean-Jacques Moreau

Tuesday, 12 March 2002

• Issue 48 Re-closed (re:custom data encodings) Marc Hadley
• Re: Resolution of Issue 182: "Fault code restriction." Marc Hadley
• Resolution of Issue 67: "convey error information." Williams, Stuart
• Resolution of Issue 182: "Fault code restriction." Williams, Stuart
• Resolution of Issue 183: Default values of SOAP header block att ributes" Williams, Stuart
• Issue 51 closed: Support different message patterns Volker Wiechers

Friday, 8 March 2002

• Issue 54 Mark Baker
• Issue 180 resolution David Fallside

Thursday, 7 March 2002

• Issue 57 closed: Usage Scenario over multiple transports Murali Janakiraman
• FW: Issue 17 closed Hoelzing, Gerd
• Re: Issue 154 closed: Invariance of role Doug Davis
• Issue 154 closed: Invariance of role Gaertner, Dietmar
• Re: Issue 179 closed: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Marc Hadley

Wednesday, 6 March 2002

• Issue 137: Martin Gudgin
• Issue 181 closed: Inconsistency between section 4.4.3 and section 2 Martin Gudgin
• Issue 184 closed: : XML Legacy Types in SOAP Encoding Schema Martin Gudgin
• Issue #44 closed : req/resp correlation over non-HTTP protocols Glen Daniels
• Issue #33 closed : modularity Glen Daniels

Tuesday, 5 March 2002

• Re: Issue 103 closed: Precisely describe message path semantics noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Issue 179 closed: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Wiechers, Volker

Monday, 4 March 2002

• Issue 16 closed: Void return type and no out arg Murali Janakiraman
• Issue 113 Closed: Representing void returns in the presence of o ut/inout params Murali Janakiraman
• Issue 178 closed: requirements imposed by end-to-end features Herve Ruellan
• Issue 103 closed: Precisely describe message path semantics John Ibbotson

Friday, 1 March 2002

• Issue 78 closed: ordering of structs Jacek Kopecky
• Issue 59 closed: mandating character encodings Jacek Kopecky
• Issue 177 closed: missing elements same as nils Jacek Kopecky

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2002 18:35:40 UTC