- From: Asir S Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:55:59 -0400
- To: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
I was asked to send this to xmlp-comments Asir -----Original Message----- From: akarmark@oracle.com [mailto:akarmark@oracle.com]On Behalf Of Anish Karmarkar Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 3:08 PM To: asirv@webmethods.com Cc: w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: Assertion 91 Asir, Thanks for pointing that out. This is a residual. General question: Should this be fixed in the current LC draft or are the drafts supposed to be frozen? Lynne has also found another residual in assertion 14. Thanks. -Anish -- Asir S Vedamuthu wrote: > > Assertion 91 in LC Test Collection [1] doc refers to, > > "For a graph edge which is distinguished by label ( "struct" or "generic" ), > the namespace name property of the element information item determines > whether the edge label is globally or locally scoped: " > > However, Part 2 no longer makes such a distinction. Is this a bug? or > residual? > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-testcollection.html#assertion > spart2 > > Regards, > > Asir S Vedamuthu > > webMethods, Inc. > 703-460-2513 or asirv@webmethods.com > http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2002 16:51:39 UTC