- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:57:31 -0500
- To: Richard@Monson-Haefel.com
- Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
Speaking for myself, not the WG: UUIDs are indeed useful, but there are also logistical issues involved in their generation. One can imagine e.g. small devices in which it would be inconvenient. SOAP makes it easy to layer functions into headers. Nothing in SOAP prevents very widespread adoption of a header used to carry such UUIDs. Nothing prevents a broad range of SOAP applications from using and mandating support for that header. By keeping SOAP modular, we somewhat lower the bar on implementation requirements. Also, we allow applications to leverage ID schemes that may be more natural in a particular environment. So, it's a tradeoff. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Richard Monson-Haefel <Richard@Monson-Haefel.com> Sent by: xmlp-comments-request@w3.org 02/12/2002 09:36 AM Please respond to Richard To: xmlp-comments@w3.org cc: Subject: UUID message identifiers It would be useful if SOAP messages were assigned a UUID when generated by the initial sender. Has this been considered and if so, why has it not been addressed in SOAP version 1.2 (draft 17)? Thanks, Richard -- Richard Monson-Haefel Author of Java Web Service (Titan Books 2002) Author of Enterprise JavaBeans, 3rd Edition (O'Reilly 2001) Co-Author of Java Message Service (O'Reilly 2000) http://www.jMiddleware.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 12:11:14 UTC