- From: Kirill Gavrylyuk <kirillg@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 14:08:17 -0800
- To: "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>, <qa-chairs@w3.org>
Thank you David, this looks good to me, addresses all of the concerns I had. > -----Original Message----- > From: David Fallside [mailto:fallside@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:15 PM > To: Kirill Gavrylyuk > Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org; qa-chairs@w3.org > Subject: XMLP Resolution of QA Issues 367, 368, 369 > > Kirill, the XMLP WG believes it has resolved issues 367. 368, 369 [2] that > were generated from the QA WG's LC comments [3]. > > Issue 367, we have introduced a Conformance section as requested, see [1]. > Issue 368, within the new conformance section: > -- we describe what constitutes (the scope of) an implementation, see also > "SOAP node" in the glossary [4] > -- we say when an implementation can say it conforms > -- we clarify the requirements for implementing Parts 1 and 2 > Issue 369, covered under resolution of #368 > > If these resolutions are not to QA's satisfaction, please inform XMLP WG > asap. > Regards, > David Fallside > on behalf of XMLP WG > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part1.html#conformance > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues#x367 .... #x369 > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002Jul/0104.html > [4] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part1.html#terminology > > ............................................ > David C. Fallside, IBM > Ext Ph: 530.477.7169 > Int Ph: 544.9665 > fallside@us.ibm.com > > >
Received on Sunday, 1 December 2002 17:08:51 UTC