Re: issue 227

This brings the question: the resolution appears clearer now than it did
originally, but isn't this a consequence of this (long) discussion, and
shouldn't the resolution text itself be clarified, so that others can clearly
understand what was meant?

Jean-Jacques.

"Williams, Stuart" wrote:

> I think that this has been discussed and clarified to let the matter rest as
> resolved by the WG.

Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2002 05:17:04 UTC