- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:06:48 -0700
- To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>, <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
Martin, You are correct, the new language allows any schema type; simple types, complex types ( including mixed content ) are all fine. Regards Martin > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@w3.org] > Sent: 02 August 2002 08:37 > To: Martin Gudgin > Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org; w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org > Subject: Re: XMLP Issue 268 Closed > > > Hello Martin, > > The way I understand it, the new language doesn't exclude > complex types anymore. If this is the case, then this > resolution is in my view satisfactory. > > I have copied the I18N IG, because although I have sent the > comments, they have later been adopted by the I18N WG. > > Regards, Martin. > > At 18:33 02/07/31 -0700, Martin Gudgin wrote: > >Martin, > > > >The XMLP Working Group have closed Issue 268[1] with the following > >resolution; > > > >Change the following text from Part 2 5.1.1[2]; > > > >'Property values are typed, and the type of a property-value > is defined > >by an XML Schema simple datatype in the specification which > introduces > >the property. For example, the type of RetryCount is xsi:int .' > > > >To read: > > > >'Where appropriate properties SHOULD have an XML Schema type' > > > >The WG will also update the property tables to include a > 'Type' column. > > > >If this resolution is not satisfactory, please could you let the > >working group know as soon as possible. > > > >Regards > > > >Martin Gudgin > >For XML Protocol Working Group > > > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x268 > >[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part2-20020626/#bindprops > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 07:07:22 UTC