- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 16:37:26 +0900
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
Hello Martin, The way I understand it, the new language doesn't exclude complex types anymore. If this is the case, then this resolution is in my view satisfactory. I have copied the I18N IG, because although I have sent the comments, they have later been adopted by the I18N WG. Regards, Martin. At 18:33 02/07/31 -0700, Martin Gudgin wrote: >Martin, > >The XMLP Working Group have closed Issue 268[1] with the following >resolution; > >Change the following text from Part 2 5.1.1[2]; > >'Property values are typed, and the type of a property-value is defined >by an XML Schema simple datatype in the specification which introduces >the property. For example, the type of RetryCount is xsi:int .' > >To read: > >'Where appropriate properties SHOULD have an XML Schema type' > >The WG will also update the property tables to include a 'Type' column. > >If this resolution is not satisfactory, please could you let the working >group know as soon as possible. > >Regards > >Martin Gudgin >For XML Protocol Working Group > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x268 >[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part2-20020626/#bindprops
Received on Friday, 2 August 2002 03:37:35 UTC