- From: Nilo Mitra (EUS) <Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:09:24 -0500
- To: "'david_costanzo@yahoo.com'" <david_costanzo@yahoo.com>
- Cc: "'xmlp-comments@w3.org'" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C358DED30DFED41192E100508BB3922701EE7B6A@eamrcnt716.exu.ericsson.se>
Thank you very much for your editorial comments. The proper place to report them is at xmlp-comments@w3.org, as stated in the 5th para of the status section of the document, but it is easy to miss, particularly if you are uninitiated. However, I am forwarding these to that list. As you find more, please forward your comments - either technical or editorial - to xmlp-comments@w3.org. The comments and discussions are archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/ Again, thanks. Your comments seem sensible will be addressed in the next version of the document. Nilo -----Original Message----- From: David Costanzo [mailto:david_costanzo@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:02 PM To: nilo.mitra@ericsson.com Subject: Typographical comments on "SOAP Version 1.2 Part 0: Primer" Greeting Nilo, I am slowly working my way through your excellent document "SOAP Version 1.2 Part 0: Primer". I have only read up through section 2, but I have encountered a some typographical errors. I am new to w3.org, so I don't know where to submit them or even if they are appreciated. If you have time, please direct me to a resource where I can learn the proper procedure for reporting non-technical issues such as mechanical corrections that are probably not interesting to the public mailing list. The following comments apply to the document at: http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/ This seems to be more recent the "editor's latest draft". However, many of the typos are in both documents. There are several inconsistent uses of the article "a" and "an" when they precede acronyms or abbreviations that begin with a vowel sounding letter. * There are about ten instances of "a RPC" and three instances of "an RPC". To me, "an RPC" reads better. * There are four instances of "a URI" and one instance of "an URI". To me, "a URI" reads better. * There is one instance of "an URL". To me, "a URL reads better". Section 2.2.2. In the phrase "... where the purpose appear to be ...", "appear" should be changed to "appears". Section 2.2.2. In the phrase "... the RPC response is returned in the body element of a SOAP message, with is modelled as a ...", "with" should be "which". Section 2.2.2. In the phrase "... which is an enumeration with potential values of 'confirmed', and 'pending' ...", the comma just before "and" should be removed. Section 2.2.2. In the phrase "... thereby making the RPC inependent of any underlying transfer mechanism.", the word "inependent" should be corrected to "independent". Also, there were several places where a space was missing after a hyper-linked word, joining it with the subsequent word. I did not note where these occurred, but I could keep an eye out for them as I continue to read though the primer, if that would be helpful. Best Regards, David Costanzo __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2002 15:09:57 UTC