Closing issue 8

The WG has decided to close issue 8 with the resolution stated below.

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Nottingham [] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 18:37
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Cc: David Fallside;
Subject: Re: Proposal for closing issue 8

Right. As I recall, I had made some general comments about the
processing model, etc. pretty early on, which were logged as an issue;
since, I believe that all of the points have been taken on by separate

I'd propose we call it redundant in light of later issues.

On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:03:10PM -0800, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> Mark can comment further but the items being discussed including 
> processing ordering, optional vs. mandatory, and faults have been 
> addressed by other issues such as #65, #100, and #106. The issue of 
> HTTP status codes is addressed by #12.
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
> >What exactly is the item(s) of concern expressed in issue #8,
> >and what is the proposal to resolve it?
> >[1]

Mark Nottingham

Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 17:05:55 UTC