Re: XMLP Issue 4 Closed (re DTD and PIs in SOAP Messages)

Larry Masinter wrote:
> It sounds to me that, rather than marking this issue "closed", it
> should be marked as an issue with the HTTP binding rather than
> with the main spec. That is, the issue remains but the locus of
> resolution has changed.
> 
I'd propose that rather than leave issue 4 open (whose focus was the 
action to take on receipt of messages including DTDs and PIs) we create 
a new issue whose sole focus is to clarify whether XML declarations are 
allowed/required in serialisations of the message.

Would this be satisfactory ?

Regards,
Marc.

> 
>> That binding
>>will, presumably, continue to use XML 1.0 serialization of the message
>>infoset,  and we should indeed be clear on whether the XML declaration is
>>allowed/required there.
>>
>>



-- 
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.

Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 05:24:12 UTC