Re: HTTP Extension Framwork in SOAP 1.2

I prefer option (i), removal.

David Fallside wrote:
> 
> An issue[1] has been raised against the recently published SOAP 1.2
> specification[2] regarding the reference to a normative binding to the HTTP
> Extension Framework[3].
> 
> The issue relates to the fact that the HTTP Extension Framework
> specification has no standing within the IETF but as an Experimental RFC.
> 
<snip/>
> 
> We would like to have your feedback/input as to whether the XMLP Working
> Group should preserve or remove the reference to the normative HTTP
> Extension Framework binding in the SOAP 1.2 specification.
> 
> The XMLP WG is considering several options:
> (i) removal of all references to HTTP Extension Framework binding
> (ii) preservation of status quo
> (iii) relocate the references to the HTTP Extension Framework binding to a
> non-normative appendix or a separately published document
> 
> Send formal comments to xmlp-comments@w3.org (archive available at [5]).
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x109
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-soap12-20010709
> [3] http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc2774.txt
> [4] http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txt
> [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/
> 
> ............................................
> David C. Fallside, IBM
> Chair, XML Protocol Working Group
> Ph: 530.477.7169
> fallside@us.ibm.com