- From: Paul Kulchenko <paulclinger@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 10:59:43 -0500 (EST)
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>, XMLP Comments <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, paulclinger@yahoo.com
Hi, Jacek! That looks reasonable, but proposal says nothing about forward vs. backward references, merging attributes on href/id elements, and references between headers or body and header. I hoped that definition of "top level" will address at least some of those. Thanks. Best wishes, Paul. --- Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com> wrote: > Hi, the WG has decided to close the issue #18 with the > resolution as presented in [1], generally by removing the terms > "top-level of serialization" and "independent elements" and thus > also allowing embedded multiref elements. > The issue #121 is duplicate of #18. > Best regards, > > Jacek Kopecky > > Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox) > http://www.systinet.com/ > > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Nov/0041.html > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com
Received on Monday, 3 December 2001 11:00:57 UTC