- From: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:22:02 -0700
- To: xmlp-comments@w3.org
............................................
David C. Fallside, IBM
Ext Ph: 530.477.7169
Int Ph: 544.9665
fallside@us.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM on 08/15/2001 11:21 AM
-----
Jacek Kopecky
<jacek@idoox.c To: David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS
om> cc:
Subject: Re: issue #42 (fwd)
08/09/2001
03:53 PM
David,
I believe the attached email closes the issue #42.
Jacek Kopecky
Idoox
http://www.idoox.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 10:44:13 -0700
From: Vidur Apparao <vidur@netscape.com>
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@idoox.com>
Subject: Re: issue #42
I believe the wording in section 7 of the current version of the spec
addresses issue #42. Thanks for following up.
--Vidur
Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> Hello Vidur,
> I was tasked with getting back to you to check whether you think
>that your issue [1] still holds with the current wording of the
>SOAP spec [2].
> The editors have changed the spec text to say "procedure or
>method" everywhere in section 7.
> Please reply to xml-dist-app@w3.org
>
> Jacek Kopecky
>
> Idoox
> http://www.idoox.com/
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x42
>[2]
http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/06/01/soap-02-infoset.html#_Toc478383532
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 14:21:58 UTC