- From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 18:30:29 +0100
- To: Miles Sabin <msabin@cromwellmedia.co.uk>
- Cc: xml-uri@w3.org
At 06:05 PM 9/7/00 +0100, Miles Sabin wrote: >But why should the URI-to-resouce binding be any more constant >than the resource-to-entity body relationship? Because that's how RFC 2396 defines it to be. What I'd like to know is what official/definitive document says whether the URI:resource relationship is 1:1 or N:1. Any offers? #g ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2000 13:31:21 UTC