- From: Miles Sabin <msabin@cromwellmedia.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 18:05:38 +0100
- To: xml-uri@w3.org
John Cowan wrote, > Dan Brickley wrote: > > [snip: change over time] > > This is so in principle, but I believe it's better to model > this as a matter of rebinding the resource-to-entity-body > relationship. That way the URI-to-resource binding is > constant, and the resource-to-entity-body relationship can > vary (or not exist). But why should the URI-to-resouce binding be any more constant than the resource-to-entity body relationship? In the general case, that is, rather than wrt specific schemes where that constraint might be imposed over and above anything specified in RFC 2396. The President isn't always the same person, and whichever person it happens to be this week isn't always the same bunch of atoms. There's scope for variation over time at _all_ levels of description. Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin Cromwell Media Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews +44 (0)20 8817 4030 London, W6 0LJ, England msabin@cromwellmedia.com http://www.cromwellmedia.com/
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2000 13:07:11 UTC