- From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:15:23 +0100
- To: "Eve L. Maler" <Eve.Maler@east.sun.com>
- Cc: xml-uri@w3.org
At 10:17 AM 7/10/00 -0400, Eve L. Maler wrote: >As always, I appreciate your thoughtful writeup. We in the Linking group >will definitely have to look at the issue, though my understanding agrees >with yours (that RDF assumes absolutizing because an RDF schema may exist >at the other end, and that XLink was getting this behavior "by reference"). The RDF spec. is explicit about requiring absolutization: toward the end of section 6 is a 3-point list describing the interpretation of namespace-qualified attributes. Item 1 makes explicit reference to RFC 2996 section 5.2. #g ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2000 09:16:09 UTC