- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:38:23 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: xml-names-editor@w3.org, annevk@opera.com, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a vexed question. A quick look at your document suggest some pretty good wording, e.g. "The prefix of a qualified name may be omitted to indicate that the name belongs to no namespace." That's exactly right, and doesn't seem awkward. Could you give some examples of wording you're not so happy with? ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFID1fwkjnJixAXWBoRAnbAAJ4zhuKHtNRlcg2nYRK3o8/w8FP5UgCdHy5q lsVpf7k+lsTlDDw01ukQsQE= =AsUc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:39:26 UTC