- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:37:10 +0200
- To: xml-names-editor@w3.org
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:30:28 +0200, Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: >>> See http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PER-xml-names-20060614/#dt-prefix, >>> which says "the namespace name may not be empty". Of course, this >>> should be an RFC2119 "must not". > >> And it should probably be noted as being a "Namespace Constraint" (NSC), >> not? > > Yes. But since that text is unchanged from the first edition (rather > than being something we introduced in the new edition), I doubt we > would decide to change it between PER and REC. I guess that's a bit more than just a simple editorial change, yes. After it goes to REC would it still be possible to solve this through errata for a possible third edition or so? -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 16 June 2006 09:37:19 UTC