I think there was some resistance to disallowing something that was previously allowed, but this isn't a matter of "disallowing" it is a matter of "recommending against". I'll leave it up to you -- oh editors -- to figure out the politically correct way of accomplishing this task. > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 4:51 AM > To: xml-names-editor@w3.org > Cc: Larry Masinter; Martin Duerst; Tim Bray > Subject: RE: Response to comment on Namespaces in XML 1.1 > > > > So the "good practice" is not just to avoid use of > > 'confusingly similar IRIs as namespace names', but to > > avoid use of URIs which have equivalent IRIs. > > So, since the difference between IRIs and URIs is which characters > can be left unescaped, this would boil down to "don't use namespace > names with unnecessary escaping". And because of the issue of case > in escapes, one might extend this to "don't use namespace names with > any escaped characters". Does that seem reasonable? > > -- Richard >Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2003 01:10:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:28 UTC