- From: <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 19:11:47 +0100
- To: xml-names-editor@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
Dear xml-names-editor,
On 28/09/2002 13:53:10 Misha Wolf wrote:
> On 27/09/2002 21:04:18 Misha Wolf wrote:
> > Dear xml-names-editor,
> >
> > This mail contains some of the comments of the I18N WG on:
> > Namespaces in XML 1.1
> > W3C Working Draft 5 September 2002
>
> [The suggested examples below have been extended to include a decimal
> numeric character reference, and have been slightly re-arranged.]
>
> Suggested examples:
[...]
It turns out [blush] that we had spelt "resumé" incorrectly. It
actually has two accents and so isn't ideal as an example. So we
propose "red&rosé" rather than "CV&resumé".
Suggested examples:
Consider:
xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%c3%a9"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%C3%a9"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%c3%A9"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%C3%A9"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosÉ"
where "é" has been defined to be "é".
The first 5 are identical for the purpose of namespace reference
matching and have the normalized attribute value [1]:
http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé
The remaining 5 differ from the first 5, as well as from each other,
and have the following normalized attribute values, respectively:
http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%c3%a9
http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%C3%a9
http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%c3%A9
http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%C3%A9
http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosÉ
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#AVNormalize
Misha Wolf
I18N WG Chair
------------------------------------------------------------- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:15:38 UTC