- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 00:12:40 -0500 (EST)
- To: mrys@microsoft.com (Michael Rys)
- Cc: richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin), jcowan@reutershealth.com (John Cowan), pgrosso@arbortext.com (Paul Grosso), Michael.Kay@softwareag.com (Kay Michael), w3c-xml-core-wg@w3.org (XML Core WG), w3c-xml-query-wg@w3.org, xml-names-editor@w3.org
Michael Rys scripsit:
> One example would be that XML 1.1 would have to be NFC normalized.
Not so. XML 1.1 should (not must) be normalized, but non-normalized documents
are still well-formed (if they meet the requirements).
> Another example would be to limit acceptable name characters
> (disregarding the welcome fix of : in names) in 1.1.
On the contrary, we are greatly extending them.
--
Yes, chili in the eye is bad, but so is your John Cowan
ear. However, I would suggest you wash your jcowan@reutershealth.com
hands thoroughly before going to the toilet. http://www.reutershealth.com
--gadicath http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Friday, 6 December 2002 00:13:45 UTC