At 05:28 PM 7/27/99 +0200, Olivier Marce wrote: > >As it has been several times mentionned before, there is still an ambiguity in >the NameSpace handling for non-prefixed attributes. >The question can be resumed by the following: >Are <foo:bar id=""> and <foo:bar foo:id=""> equivalent, given any namespace >"foo" ? > >My understanding is they are not. There is no ambiguity. The spec *allows* but does not *require* <foo:bar id=""> and <foo:bar foo:id=""> to be considered identical by namespace-sensitive applications. This was a careful decision - requiring equivalence was also a reasonable thing to do, but on balance the current design was considered more useful by the WG. -TimReceived on Tuesday, 27 July 1999 12:40:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:22 UTC