Re: Request for XML Encryption MIME type registration

Hello Jose,

Many thanks for your request, which is almost complete. However,
for point 4, your type has actually been discussed on the
ietf-types@iana.org mailing list, and that, rather than (or in
addition to) the fact that XML Encryption is a REC, is what the
IESG will probably look at.

So can you please look at the archive at
http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/ and
provide a few pointers. I'd mainly look out for mails
by Joseph Reagle and pick the most important ones.

Regards,    Martin.

At 12:25 04/06/08 +0200, Jose Kahan wrote:
>Hello Martin,
>
>Per [1], I'm addressing you this request on behalf of the expired
>XML Encryption WG.
>
>2. Expected date of state transition (publication in TR), and next state
>(CR or PR) (so that we know when we can send this to the IESG, and don't
>loose time).
>
>XML Encryption and all its related documents have already been
>published as W3C Recommendations [2]. As discussed with you, we would
>announce the MIME type approval using the appropriate
>errata document [3].
>
>3. Pointer to registration template at the place it will be published
>(dated and undated), so that we can tell the IESG what to review.
>
>http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmlenc-core-20021210/#sec-MediaType-Registration
>
>It was published within the recommendation the 10 Dec. 2002.
>
>4. Pointer to Last Call email to c and following
>discussion/comment resolution (relevant threads in email archive and/or
>relevant part of Last Call resolution table), so that we can show to the
>IESG that this has received appropriate community review.
>
>I guess that because XML-Enc is already a Recommendation, we can skip
>this point.
>
>-jose
>
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2004Apr/0000.html
>[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmlenc-core-20021210/
>[3] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2002/12-xmlenc-errata

Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2004 23:40:13 UTC