- From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 23:11:53 +0100
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
r/reagle@w3.org/2002.05.24/17:59:48 >On Friday 24 May 2002 10:44, merlin wrote: >> We had a long discussion on the list about RSA/OAEP, ending in: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2002Apr/0122.html >> >> Something is still unclear to me from the discussion, as reflected in: >> >> http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xmlenc-core/Overview.html#sec-RS >>A-OAEP >> >> Is the DigestMethod child optional? > >I presume not. (I've argued it shouldn't.) Don, do you mind if I make it >required? FWIW, I agree with you. I dislike the fixed SHA-1 for MGF but that has been declared final. >> (Aside: The Schema Definition quoted in 5.4.2 is no longer current.) > >In what way? §5.4.2: Schema Definition: ... <element name='OAEPparams' minOccurs='0' type='base64Binary'/> <element ref='ds:DigestMethod' minOccurs='0'/> ... §3.2 Schema Definition: <element name='OAEPparams' minOccurs='0' type='base64Binary'/> <any namespace='##other' minOccurs='0' maxOccurs='unbounded'/> merlin
Received on Friday, 24 May 2002 18:12:29 UTC