W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Draft registration for application/xenc+xml

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 14:40:53 -0400
To: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Cc: ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, ian@w3.org, xml-encryption@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020524144053.H19846@www.markbaker.ca>

On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 02:13:59PM -0400, Joseph Reagle wrote:
> Hi Mark, the XML Encryption syntax has the capacity to represent this 
> information. (And it is OPTIONAL, so if we have it in both places, it would 
> be odd to have it be required in the mediatype.) If you encrypt a PNG, the 
> resulting instance might look like:

Sorry, I forgot about 'MimeType'.  That changes things.  I agree that
the parameter is redundant, and therefore I'd recommend against it.

I've just had a quick look at the spec, but I need to spend more time
thinking about MimeType & Type, to make sure that it handles this
properly.  For example, I would think that a recommendation to not
guess the value of MimeType, but to reuse the media type (if known)
of the content, would be a good idea.

More later, if I find anything requiring comment.  Thanks.

Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Friday, 24 May 2002 14:32:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:09 UTC