- From: Takeshi Imamura <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:22:41 +0900
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>, xml-encryption@w3.org
Joseph, >Ok, I understand! The following text clarifies this issue for me, is it >acceptable? > >Include Y in place of e and its descendants in X. Since [XPath] does not >define methods of replacing node-sets the result MUST be equivalent to >replacing e with the octet stream resulting from its decryption in the >serialized form of X and reparsing the document. However, the actual method >of performing this operation is left to the implementor. This text is good to me if the second sentence is changed as follows: Since [XPath] does not define methods of replacing node-sets from different documents, the result ... Thanks, Takeshi IMAMURA Tokyo Research Laboratory IBM Research imamu@jp.ibm.com
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2002 01:23:24 UTC