- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 13:33:25 -0400
- To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>, merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
On Thursday 18 July 2002 12:38 am, Takeshi Imamura wrote: > I'm not sure whether such an assumption is reasonable, but given the fact > that our processing rule allows an application to perform serialization > and hence we cannot avoid that some entity references are included, I > think that if entity declaration information is available, we should care > about entity declarations. If we do so, all we have to do is, as you > proposed, to drop item 1 from the process and an XML declaration from an > example in Section 4.3.4. I suppose we can continue with the presumption for now unless it becomes to be a big problem. I've removed the XML declaration from the process and example [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/Drafts/xmlenc-core/Overview.html new revision: 1.221 > By the way, it seems that the draft does not contain any description > about "parsing context". Shouldn't we add it, possibly to Section 4.3.1? Sure! Back in January [2] I was trying to provide a sensible definition of "parsing context" and you suggested something akin to "fragment context information" but its definition, by itself, wasn't that informative to me. However, please propose text if you can! [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2002Jan/0029.html
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 13:34:07 UTC