- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:43:57 -0500
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, dee3@torque.pothole.com
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
Well, as we don't even use URL or URN in this spec, I removed the refs. On Wednesday 23 January 2002 06:35, Martin Duerst wrote: > >We also cite URI/URN, and I don't think any draft has superceded RFC1738 > > in whole. > > What parts of RFC 1738 do you think are not covered in RFC 2396? > It could be that there are some individual URI schemes described > in RFC 1738 that haven't been described yet in any new RFC, but > you don't need a reference to particular URI schemes. -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 13:44:26 UTC