Re: WOOPS: xmlenc Call 13:00 EST 20020107

Hi Joseph,

> Draft
>   Pending
>      * Christian Geuer-Pollmann: Encrypting IV in ECB

does this mean that the 2nd item in [1] which was "Encrypting IV in ECB" is 
reopened?

In that case, I'd prefer it to formulate this even more radically:

- Encrypting IV in EBC and omit the xenc:EncryptedData/@Nonce functionality 
from the spec.

Christian

[1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/11/last-call-issues.html

Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2002 14:19:14 UTC