- From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:11:37 -0500
- To: "'reagle@w3.org'" <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>, xml-encryption@w3.org
Hi, I can change the table into a list. Note that the key encrypting key has three specific values. If there are entries for certain special wrapped key sizes for a particular key encrypting key size, then Other means other values of wrapped key size. For a key encrypting key size of 192, there are no special requirement levels for wrapped key sizes so the entry applies to All wrapped key sizes. It would clearly be wrong to put "All" anywhere in this table where it now says "Other" or vice versa. Perhaps I should have made the key encrypting key values of 128 and 256, which have multiple lines in the table, be vertically spanning so it would be more visually obvious. The best I can come up with for AES key wrap reference is "AES Key Management" <http://csrc.nist.gov/encryption/kms/>. Donald -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:10 PM To: Donald E Eastlake 3rd; xml-encryption@w3.org Cc: Donald Eastlake III Subject: Re: AES Key Wrap Section On Sunday 23 December 2001 20:29, Donald E Eastlake 3rd wrote: > Attached is an AES Key Wrap section for the algorithms part of the XML > Encryption draft. Thank you Donald, it's now in version FOO. 1. I've tweaked this (and much of 5) such that variables and equations are within <code/> elements. 2. We found it advantageous in the past to avoid a table, and I wonder if we might do the same here. 3. Within the table, what is the difference between any and other? 4. Do we have a reference to the AES Key Wrap document? -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 7 January 2002 14:11:54 UTC