Re: Replacement for Nonce paragraph in section 3.2

On Thursday 27 December 2001 13:38, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 wrote:
> Well, white space should be ignored in base64 text. Having spaces there
> illustrates that.

If we want to make that point, I'd recommend having some text saying so, 
but I'm not confident we need to make that point here.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:11 PM
> To: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008; xml-encryption@w3.org
> Cc: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
> Subject: Re: Replacement for Nonce paragraph in section 3.2
>
>
> Also, I'm presuming that the spaces in <Nonce> Zm9v </Nonce> in 5.5
> aren't intentional; I've delete them.

-- 

Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/

Received on Wednesday, 2 January 2002 17:02:42 UTC