- From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:54:52 -0500
- To: "'Christian Geuer-Pollmann'" <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
Actually, since OAEPparams can be null, I don't see any reason for the element to be mandatory...
Donald
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann
[mailto:geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 5:52 PM
To: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org; Donald Eastlake III
Subject: Re: RSA-OAEP
Hi Donald,
same problem for the params ;-)) We MUST include them, OK? So that the
'default' OAEP from the RFC looks like this:
<EncryptionMethod xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#"
Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#rsa-oaep-mgf1p">
<DigestMethod xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"
Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1"></ds:DigestMethod>
<OAEPparams></OAEPparams>
</EncryptionMethod>
the OAEPParams is of length 0.
OK?
Christian
Received on Wednesday, 2 January 2002 10:54:56 UTC