Re: Minor comments on Section 4

On Wednesday 19 September 2001 09:49, edsimon@xmlsec.com wrote:
>  I don't see this as "inconsistent and awkward".

I wasn't characterizing Takeshi's comment as inconsistent or awkard. His 
and your suggestions are steps towards clarity. My point was that even with 
these steps, I still am not completely confident in the text. I think this 
would be aided by defining the various parties and being clear about the 
requirements with respect to each, and what it means to be a conformant 
Encryptor, Decryptor, or Application ... But I haven't thought it through 
completely myself.

> "serialize the data in UTF-8 (as specified in [XML]) to obtain the octets
> to be encrypted"

Ok.

Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2001 15:25:50 UTC