Re: Decryption Transform for XML Signature

Donald,

We also think so, but this is just a spec and we can leave its
implementation to implementers.  Or, do you think we should define the spec
based on an octet sequence, like the XML Encryption spec?

Thanks,
Takeshi IMAMURA
Tokyo Research Laboratory
IBM Research
imamu@jp.ibm.com



From: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com> on 2001/06/07
      11:25

Please respond to "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>

To:   Takeshi Imamura/Japan/IBM@IBMJP, Hiroshi Maruyama/Japan/IBM@IBMJP,
      "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org>
cc:
Subject:  Re: Decryption Transform for XML Signature



While I think this transform does the right thing, I get the feeling
there is an aweful lot of bouncing back and forth between octets
and node sets....

Donald

From:  "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
Message-Id:  <4.3.2.7.2.20010521130714.02fe3680@localhost>
Date:  Mon, 21 May 2001 13:10:09 -0400
To:  Takeshi Imamura <imamu@jp.ibm.com>, Hiroshi Maruyama
<maruyama@jp.ibm.com>
Cc:  "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org>

>I've posted your proposal at [1] with a few editorial tweaks (mostly in
the
>Security Considerations). People should read and comment, but barring any
>substantive opposition by May 29, I'll move it forward as a W3C Working
Draft.
>
>
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/10-decryption-transform.html
>
>--
>Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
>W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
>IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
>W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/

Received on Thursday, 14 June 2001 09:10:37 UTC