- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:55:08 -0400
- To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Cc: <xml-encryption@w3.org>
At 12:13 6/11/2001, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote:
>Although I think the specification ends up being more or less correct,
>I think its approach is unnecessarily confusing. I think that XML
Ok, it has a little bit of Ed, Don, and Joseph in it <smile/>, could still
use tweaks still I'm sure.
[
http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/11-proposal.html#sec-CipherReference
$Revision: 1.16 $ on $Date: 2001/06/11 21:53:56 $
by $Author:reagle $
]
--
Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 11 June 2001 17:55:25 UTC