- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 15:18:32 -0400
- To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Frederick J. Hirsch" <hirsch@zolera.com>, <xml-encryption@w3.org>
At 02:12 6/6/2001, Takeshi Imamura wrote:
>I agree with you that we should define our Transforms element to clarify
>its behavior, especially what is the input to the first Transform and what
>the output from the last Transform is passed to.
Ok, please look at:
http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/11-proposal.html#sec-CipherData
$Revision: 1.11 $ on $Date: 2001/06/06 19:16:01 $
Do you also believe we need to be more specific about node/octet
translations between those types of transforms, or can we just rely upon
[XMLDSIG]}
--
Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 15:21:46 UTC