Re: CipherData rationale

At 02:12 6/6/2001, Takeshi Imamura wrote:
>I agree with you that we should define our Transforms element to clarify
>its behavior, especially what is the input to the first Transform and what
>the output from the last Transform is passed to.

Ok, please look at:
         http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/11-proposal.html#sec-CipherData
         $Revision: 1.11 $ on $Date: 2001/06/06 19:16:01 $

Do you also believe we need to be more specific about node/octet 
translations between those types of transforms, or can we just rely upon 
[XMLDSIG]}


--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/

Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 15:21:46 UTC