- From: Joseph Ashwood <jashwood@arcot.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:54:34 -0800
- To: "meadowsj" <meadowsj@nobs.ca.boeing.com>, <xml-encryption@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "meadowsj" <meadowsj@nobs.ca.boeing.com> To: <xml-encryption@w3.org>; <jashwood@arcot.com> > If signing a document is akin to making an assertion about a document, > I could perceive some value in keeping certain assertions made about a > document private from third parties. I'm hard pressed to think of an > example where storing those assertions with the document would be an > absolute necessity however, so perhaps it's a non-issue. > > Cheers, > Joe Meadows Actually that's a very good point that hadn't occured to me. I'm still at a loss of any examples where knowledge of the document must be public knowledge but the signer cannot be, except possibly to give anonymous testimony to something, where the testimony could be verified later. Maybe that's enough. I'm not sure it would seem to be a business end of things, and I'm an engineering end. Does anyone have any examples? Or is this a non-issue from the business end also. Or would simply forcing detached signatures with out of band ordering information be enough? Joe
Received on Monday, 29 January 2001 15:54:47 UTC