W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > December 2001

Re: yet other minor suggests re current draft

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:02:42 -0500
To: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>, "'xml-encryption@w3.org'" <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Cc: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
Message-Id: <20011206170242.B9F76827@policy.w3.org>
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 16:59, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 wrote:
> Section 1.3
> 	It seems to me that the last paragraph in this section refers not to the
> namespace immediately above it but, confusingly, to the first namespace
> listed in Section 1.3. This could be fixed in several ways. I suggest
> taking the middle (one sentence) paragraph in this section and the
> immediately following namespace and moving them as a block to the end of
> the section.


> Section 3.3
> 	In the schema given, I think the "extension" end tag should be indented
> a space to line up with the start tag.

Done, also moved Nonce to the EncryptedData element.

> Section 3.5
> 	Although the draft claims that Transforms is in the XMLENC namespace,
> the example just before the Section 3.6 header uses "ds:Transforms".

CipherReference's Transforms is in &xenc; because its semantics are 
different (process of receiver in order to decrypt.) ReferenceList 
Transforms are in &dsig; because they are the same as dsig (process by both 
sender and receiver with same start in order to obtain the same result). We 
should clarify this if my understanding is correct.


Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2001 12:02:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:05 UTC