- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:01:31 -0400
- To: "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org>
As always comments, corrections, discussion is welcome. http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Minutes/010423-tele.html A few issues were deferred to the list for further discussion, including: * Imamura: [9]Does CipherData include CryptoBinary or a set of Transforms? Reagle: We probably need a new element, what should we call it? + Need some new structure, two candidates include 1. Reagle: Two children of CipherData: Reference and Value. 2. Eastlake: Two alternatives to replace CipherData: Cipher(Data|Value) and CipherReference Deferred to more discussion on list. * [10]NameKey, should we think of a better name? + Herzberg: Make it of the form of (prefix)KeyName (like "friendly") + Reagle: where prefix communicates that this is the name of the (symmetric) key encrypted and carried in the EncryptedKey CipherData. (But please see all the minutes as I try to keep them short.) __ Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 23 April 2001 14:01:35 UTC