- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 15:32:17 -0400
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Cc: XML Encryption WG <xml-encryption@w3.org>
At 21:10 3/27/2001 -0500, Rich Salz wrote: >Would this mean that XMLEnc depends and/or requires Schema? That would >be a very bad thing. I agree that we want to avoid large dependencies on other specs where possible. Saying a ElementData must conform to the schema definition is different than requiring every encryption application to be schema requirements. __ Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 2 April 2001 15:32:43 UTC