- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:59:55 -0500
- To: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Cc: "Public XML Encryption List" <xml-encryption@w3.org>
At 21:37 11/14/2000 +0100, Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote: >>I still don't understand... > >In [1], there is mentioned > > "Each character is a logically separate information > item, but XML applications are free to chunk > characters into larger groups as necessary or desirable." > >But if we talk about "Nodes" in a "Tree", all characters are grouped into a >whole node. If the smallest encryptable unit is a node, it would not be >possible (allowed ?) only to select specific parts of a text block >(character node). > >Should it be allowed to encrypt only parts of a character node without >adding markup prior to encryption? Aha! I understand. In my opinion, this is not presently done by any of the proposals, doing this might be technically awkward (going beyond even the complete Information Set data model to XPath range like constructs over CDATA!), and IMHO I don't see enough compelling cases to go to the effort of doing it. >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset#infoitem.character >Christian __ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2000 16:00:47 UTC