- From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 10:00:51 +0100
- To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>, Gerald Huck <huck@darmstadt.gmd.de>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
Hi, Joseph --On Donnerstag, 9. November 2000 18:18 -0500 "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org> wrote: >> R3.4.1 XES MUST define a uniform naming scheme for >> serialization/transformation/encryption algorithms > > What does this mean? I don't _think_ we've identified a desire to create > a transformation process like that in Signature. Also what do you mean by > transformations? Wouldn't transforms make sense? At the workshop, there was the diecussion about c14n and compression, which read (if I understood it right): * If you want to c14n you instances before encryption - do so! * If you want to compress you instances before encryption - do so! but how do we indicate what we did if we don't have a list of transformations? This would make the "compression or not" discussion obsolete, because the application could choose. Best regards, Christian
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2000 04:12:25 UTC