- From: Takeshi Imamura <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 11:26:05 +0900
- To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org, "Hiroshi Maruyama" <MARUYAMA@jp.ibm.com>
Joseph, I mean by the sentence that there will exist some data models (e.g., information set) suitable for XML encryption and satisfying our design assumptions, and we should discuss which one is best. Does this make sense? Thanks, Takeshi IMAMURA Tokyo Research Laboratory IBM Research E-mail: imamu@jp.ibm.com From: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>@w3.org on 2000/11/07 08:37 AM Please respond to "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org> Sent by: xml-encryption-request@w3.org To: Hiroshi Maruyama/Japan/IBM@IBMJP cc: "Public XML Encryption List" <xml-encryption@w3.org> Subject: Data Model Hiroshi, in my minutes I think I copied something from your slides that stated: "Hiroshi: "What data model is suitable for XML Encryption and <EncryptionInfo> and which should be adopted?" What did you mean by this? __ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 6 November 2000 21:26:21 UTC