- From: Dick Brooks <dick@8760.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:49:39 -0600
- To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: <hal@finney.org>, <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Joseph, Sorry for the long delay, but I wanted to discuss your question with others in the Energy Industry before responding. Regarding, > So with respect to your request of "support" PGP, could you be > specific so I > can include it in [2]? Are you advocating it be the mandatory > algorithm in > one or more of the algorithm types, or a particular key structure? > > [0] > http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-blake-wilson-xmldsig- > ecdsa-00.txt > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xmldsig-core-20001031/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/11/15-xml-encryption-req.html The main requirement for the Energy industry is the ability to utilize the installed base of PGP keys for both encryption and digital signature purposes. XMLDsig [1] already supports PGP keys for signing XML content. It appears the Energy industry requirements are already represented in [2] under the section titled "Processing", subsection "Transforms": " Signature Transform The specification must address how to use XML Signature with XML Encryption such that multiple parties may selectively encrypt and sign portions of documents that may already be signed and encrypted." Hal's involvement in these discussions leads me to believe that PGP will ultimately provide the functionality defined by XML Dsig and XML encryption. Fair assumption Hal? Thanks, Dick Brooks (co-chair Gas Industry Standards Board Electronic Delivery Mechanism Committee) Group 8760 110 12th Street North Birmingham, AL 35203 dick@8760.com 205-250-8053 Fax: 205-250-8057 http://www.8760.com/ InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions
Received on Sunday, 17 December 2000 11:53:47 UTC