- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:10:49 -0400
- To: MBRICENO@XCERT.COM
- Cc: "Public XML Encryption List" <xml-encryption@w3.org>
1. Can we write one schema that permits portions to be encrypted, or must we write as many schema as possible varied encrypted instances, or must the XML instance be well-formed only? 2. Signed and Encrypting: Sign then Encrypt. (Is the Encryption subject signed as well: Sign/Encrypt/Sign?) 3. Which way does the reference between the KeyInfo and the EncryptedContent point? 4. Philosophical/Design Issue: we should not have any expectation that we will be able to tell people how to write their schema with respect to Encryption. 5. Canonicalization?: How heavy need it be? Must we worry about namespace context? A binary canonical form has the potential of being efficient, need it be XML? Compression ... _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 25 August 2000 18:10:53 UTC