xml-editor@w3.org from April to June 2000 by date

Wednesday, 28 June 2000

RE: Error in XML documentation? Fran�ois Yergeau
Error in XML documentation? Alex Golden F-65 coop

Tuesday, 27 June 2000

Unable to load XML page in Mac IE 5.0 whang@iris.com
error MFreemantle

Monday, 26 June 2000

On XML errata from the minutes of the I18N WG Martin J. Duerst

Saturday, 24 June 2000

Processor vs parser Lars Marius Garshol

Tuesday, 20 June 2000

RE: error in xml specs: PubidLiteral Fran�ois Yergeau
error in xml specs: PubidLiteral Frank Thommen

Monday, 12 June 2000

Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 Dan Connolly
Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 7 June 2000

Re: XML production [2] vs. SGML declaration: C1 and DEL Steven Pemberton

Tuesday, 6 June 2000

RE: errata list errata Fran�ois Yergeau

Monday, 5 June 2000

errata list errata schererm@us.ibm.com
XML 1.0 Specification Errata Nathan D. Ryan
Request for clarification (excluding text declaration) Yuji Ichikawa

Friday, 2 June 2000

XML 1.0 Specification Errata Nathan D. Ryan
XML 1.0 Specification Errata Nathan D. Ryan

Wednesday, 31 May 2000

XML 1.0 Specification Errata Dieter Köhler
Re: XML production [2] vs. SGML declaration: C1 and DEL John Cowan

Monday, 29 May 2000

XML production [2] vs. SGML declaration: C1 and DEL Martin J. Duerst

Sunday, 28 May 2000

RE: error report REC-xml-19980210 François Yergeau

Friday, 26 May 2000

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition David Brownell
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition David Brownell

Thursday, 25 May 2000

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition John Cowan

Wednesday, 24 May 2000

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Steve DeRose

Thursday, 25 May 2000

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition John Cowan
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Paul Grosso
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition John Cowan
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Steve Schafer
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition John Cowan
RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Leigh Dodds
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition David Brownell
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition David Brownell
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition David Brownell
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition John Aldridge
error report REC-xml-19980210 Bantle Michael
RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Kay Michael
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Taba Miklos
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Tim Bray
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Steve Schafer
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Susan Lesch

Tuesday, 25 May 100

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition John Cowan
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition John Cowan

Thursday, 25 May 2000

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Steve Schafer
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Susan Lesch

Wednesday, 24 May 2000

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition John Cowan
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition John Cowan
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition John Cowan
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Steve Schafer
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Steve Schafer
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Steve Schafer
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Rick JELLIFFE
Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition Liam R. E. Quin
Re: unreachable symbols in the XML grammar Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 23 May 2000

unreachable symbols in the XML grammar Michael.Goulish@SoftwareAG-USA.com

Thursday, 18 May 2000

Unknown error? Hassan Ait-Kaci

Wednesday, 17 May 2000

possible error? Cathcart, Dan
the use of xml david langille

Tuesday, 16 May 2000

XML grammar Jason St-Cyr

Tuesday, 9 May 2000

minor omission Woody Anderson

Wednesday, 3 May 2000

http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.xml Glenn family
Re: Location of "XML V1.0 Specification" updated for the Errata Dan Connolly
Location of "XML V1.0 Specification" updated for the Errata Srinivasan Raman

Monday, 1 May 2000

Re: Possible error in XML spec Tim Bray
Possible error in XML spec Bryan Brown

Thursday, 27 April 2000

Re: Official ISO 639 changes Martin J. Duerst

Wednesday, 26 April 2000

Re: Official ISO 639 changes David Brownell

Sunday, 25 April 100

Re: Official ISO 639 changes John Cowan

Tuesday, 25 April 2000

RE: Official ISO 639 changes Elliotte Rusty Harold
RE: Official ISO 639 changes Fran�ois Yergeau
Re: Official ISO 639 changes Tim Bray
Re: Official ISO 639 changes Michael Everson
Re: Official ISO 639 changes Elliotte Rusty Harold

Sunday, 16 April 2000

Minor error/defect in the published XML grammar Peter T. Breuer

Friday, 14 April 2000

Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML John Cowan
remark xml Otto, Albrecht
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Martin J. Duerst
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Martin J. Duerst

Thursday, 13 April 2000

Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Rick Jelliffe
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Rick Jelliffe
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Rick Jelliffe
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML MURATA Makoto

Tuesday, 13 April 100

Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML John Cowan

Thursday, 13 April 2000

Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Martin J. Duerst
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Martin J. Duerst
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Martin J. Duerst
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Paul Hoffman / IMC
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Tim Bray

Wednesday, 12 April 2000

Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Paul Hoffman / IMC
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Tim Bray
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Sujatha N. Marsden
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Paul Hoffman / IMC
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Tim Bray

Monday, 12 April 100

Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification John Cowan

Wednesday, 12 April 2000

Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Tim Bray
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Dan Connolly
Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Tim Bray
UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Martin J. Duerst
SP,% before encoding declaration (was: RE: I18N issues with the XML Specification) Martin J. Duerst
About UTF-7 (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification) Martin J. Duerst

Tuesday, 11 April 2000

RE: I18N issues with the XML Specification mark.davis@us.ibm.com
RE: I18N issues with the XML Specification François Yergeau
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification mark.davis@us.ibm.com
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Tim Bray

Monday, 10 April 2000

Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification mark.davis@us.ibm.com

Sunday, 9 April 2000

FREE E-Books, FREE Report, FREE Support! wcd@excelonline.com

Thursday, 6 April 2000

Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification John Cowan
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification MURATA Makoto
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification MURATA Makoto

Wednesday, 5 April 2000

Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Rick Jelliffe
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Rick Jelliffe
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Tim Bray
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification John Cowan
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification John Cowan
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Rick Jelliffe
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Rick Jelliffe
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification John Cowan
Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification MURATA Makoto

Tuesday, 4 April 2000

Re: I18N issues with the XML Specification Rick Jelliffe
error report - XML version problem Hen-Tov Atzmon

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 June 2000 14:15:12 UTC