- From: Fabian Ritzmann <Fabian.Ritzmann@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:16:28 +0300
- To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Christopher B Ferris wrote: > Thanks for the detailed review and feedback. > > The WG has agreed to address your concern by applying the original > issue resolution [1] > correctly (there was a cut-n-paste error). We hope that this addresses > your concern. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4506 Just to be clear, the following text was pasted accidentally and you are going to remove it entirely with no other changes? "ensure that a response message is serialized as application/xop+xml a client can send an application/xop+xml request message." Your change would address my concern appropriately. Thanks for considering my comment. Fabian > xml-dist-app-request@w3.org wrote on 10/09/2007 08:48:44 AM: > > > Hi, > > > > I am commenting in lieu of Monica Martin and Pete Wenzel. They had > > reviewed the LC edition [1] of the MTOM Serialization Policy > > Assertion 1.1 document. The same issue is present in the latest > > editor's working draft [2]. > > > > The text in paragraph 3.2 is garbled. Here is how it looks like now: > > > /wsoma:MTOM/@wsp:Optional="true" > > Per Web Services Policy [WS-Policy], this is compact notation for > > two policy alternatives, one with and one without the assertion. > > This indicates that the behavior indicated by the assertion is > > optional, specifically that non-MTOM-encoded exchanges are also > > supported by the endpoint. > > When an endpoint reflects a compact policy expression with the MTOM > > assertion marked with wsp:Optional='true', it may be difficult to > > know which alternative has been engaged. In such cases, if a request > > message is received that is an application/soap+xml message, then > > the receiving endpoint SHOULD respond (if at all) with an > application/soap+xml > > response message unless there is some other indicator that specifies > > that the response is to be sent using MTOM encoding. > > ensure that a response message is serialized as application/xop+xml > > a client can send an application/xop+xml request message. > > For example, when using SOAP/HTTP binding, the Accept HTTP header > value of > > multipart/related; type=application/xop+xml in the request message > > indicates that the response may be sent using MTOM encoding. > > > > We assume that it was intended to say instead: > > > /wsoma:MTOM/@wsp:Optional="true" > > Per Web Services Policy [WS-Policy], this is compact notation for > > two policy alternatives, one with and one without the assertion. > > This indicates that the behavior indicated by the assertion is > > optional, specifically that non-MTOM-encoded exchanges are also > > supported by the endpoint. > > When an endpoint reflects a compact policy expression with the MTOM > > assertion marked with wsp:Optional='true', it may be difficult to > > know which alternative has been engaged. In such cases, if a request > > message is received that is an application/soap+xml message, then > > the receiving endpoint SHOULD respond (if at all) with an > application/soap+xml > > response message unless there is some other indicator that specifies > > that the response is to be sent using MTOM encoding. > > For example, when using SOAP/HTTP binding, the Accept HTTP header > value of > > multipart/related; type=application/xop+xml in the request message > > indicates that the response may be sent using MTOM encoding. > > In the absence of such an indicator, a client can ensure that a > > response message is serialized as application/xop+xml by sending an > > application/xop+xml request message. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Fabian Ritzmann > > > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/mtompolicy.html > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-soap12-mtom-policy-20070918/ > > > -- > > Fabian Ritzmann > > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > Stella Business Park Phone +358-9-525 562 96 > > Lars Sonckin kaari 12 Fax +358-9-525 562 52 > > 02600 Espoo Email Fabian.Ritzmann@Sun.COM > > Finland
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 14:16:56 UTC