- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:58:39 +0100
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1, we should be able to set the assertion at the message/operation level (SOAP/WSDL terminology). Another example that comes to mind is SOAP-Reponse, i.e. a GET/POST request followed by an MTOM response. JJ. Christopher B Ferris wrote: > > Title: granularity of MTOM policy assertion > > Description: The assertion requires all messages, regardless of > whether there is binary content, to be sent as > application/xop+xml. Is this correct behavior? Shouldn't the assertion > granularity be finer, e.g. such that a client > could send a SOAP request (application/soap+xml) and receive an MTOM > response (application/xop+xml) > and vice-versa? > > Justification: seems odd at best to send xop serialized message even > when there is no binary content. > > Type: technical > > Proposal: TBD > > Cheers, > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris > phone: +1 508 377 9295
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 16:59:09 UTC